I decided to give an article in Foreign Policy a fair chance and got as far as this before giving up.
"That means they [Iran] could retaliate by carrying out more acts of terrorism, which is a low-cost tool the regime has already mastered."
So let's understand. The Iranians were treacherously attacked for no reason just after they made big concessions in negotiations (which must have been intended to lull them into a false sense of security), 49 top Iranians were murdered by the Americans without any provocation, 170 Iranians mostly schoolgirls were murdered when a school was hit by the Americans but the Iranians are the terrorists, not the Americans and not Netanyahu who persuaded Trump to do this?
"In the long term, Iranian officials may finally dash for and build a nuclear weapon. A weak Iran, in other words, will remain very dangerous."
Whose fault will it be if Iran gets the bomb. America's for murdering the Ayatollah who opposed getting it?
Iran wants to force America out of the Middle East even if she wrecks the global economy to do so.
Paradoxically, nothing is more in America's interest than to get out and stay out.
It would make the whole world safer except Israel.
As it is America is a danger even to Romania. America wants to use her base in Romania to hit Iran and this invites a missile in reply.
This is absolutely correct. It is much more likely that Israel or the US even use a nuclear weapon on Iran than the other way round, and that is not only because Iran does not have any nuclear weapons. It is because the Americans present themselves as the morally righteous ones who are allowed to get away with murder and worse because they are the 'good guys'. All of this leave anyone in their right mind disgusted.
ReplyDelete