Posts
CIA-MI6 and Mossad are now fighting on many fronts,.especially the Mossad.
For Netanyahu, rightly, the most important front is in the USA and is to a large extent fought on social and other media.
X and TikTok were dangers but TikTok in the USA has now been captured by the ardent Zionist Larry Ellison acting in league with Netanyahu.
We have seen the recent CIA-Mossad-MI6 attempt to 'regime change' Iran and the way the mainstream media carefully hides the truth - it involved Mossad assets murdering innocent people. Impossible then not to accept in full the theory that the Ukrainian revolution of 2014 was another such operation. The UK is important to the USA and to Israel and suppressing pro-Palestinian opinions happened very effectively there.
It is clear that Mandelson, a Zionist whose salary was paid by Ghislaine Maxwell in his first job, and his mentee the equally Zionist McSweeney achieved a regime change in the Labour Party with the help of Israel, the CIA and MI6. Labour MPs who were hostile were slimed by McSweeney and Starmer as anti-Semites and expelled. It enabled them to get rid of their enemies and it served the interests of Israel and the CIA MI6 deep state which is closely allied to Israel.
The CIA, of course, attempted to undermine and regime change Donald Trump in his first administration.
The US organisation that does much of this work is NED. It was closely involved in the Ukrainian revolution in 2004 as well as the 2014 one and tried hard to overthrow Lukashenko in Belarus.
It's a pity that the CIA was not wound up as some Republicans proposed after the Cold War. A pity that Nato was not dissolved, for that matter.
The video is here.
I quote from Mr Benz.
'Today the the CIA, the Pentagon, USAD, the State Department are have been funding NOS's and civil society fronts to pick sides in the civil war between
the Republican party predominantly because of the MAGA populist side of the Republican party that is for prioritizing domestic affairs and limiting the international affairs budget. the warmongering, the USAID expenditures and the like. And that obviously runs straight against the interests of the US foreign policy establishment. And so what we saw today against the Republican party has been a
national security apparatus that appears to be anti-Republican, although it's really not. It's just picking sides in the Civil War. They would not be anti-Republican, for example, if Nikki Haley were the front runner or Mitt Romney or John McCain. They're simply picking sides in the Republican civil war the same way they would back a tribal guerrilla movement in Sudan over over a rival. And this is what was being done to the Democrat party in the 1960s and 70s.'
The CIA, of course, attempted to undermine and regime change Donald Trump in his first administration.
The US organisation that does much of this work is NED. It was closely involved in the Ukrainian revolution in 2004 as well as the 2014 one and tried hard to overthrow Lukashenko in Belarus.
It's a pity that the CIA was not wound up as some Republicans proposed after the Cold War. A pity that Nato was not dissolved, for that matter.
The video is here.
He goes on to explain how Soros's and Blackstone's US Government links have enabled them to make billions by inside knowledge of US regime change and other operations.
Mike Benz is very impressive. I shall start listening to his podcasts as I do those of Jeffrey Sachs, John Mearsheimer, Max Blumenthal, Katey Halper, former US ambassador Chas Freeman, former intelligence officers such as Alastair Crooke, Ray McGovern, Larry Wilkerson, et al.
I quote from Mr Benz.
'This goes back to essentially the intelligence structure that grew out of World War II. In World War II, you had the United States support for Europe against obviously Hitler and Mussolini. And in the course of that, the predecessor to the CIA, the OSS had to make allies with various organs of civil society during the war made alliances with church institutions and the Vatican, which was being persecuted by Mussolini. had to make allies with trade, labor, and union groups which ran logistics in Europe and therefore supplies for weapons and cash and all manner of aid. And when World War II ended and the OSS, our wartime spy agency, became the CIA, the peacetime spy agency, we essentially kept those practices of partnership with civil society instead for a hot war for a cold war. And so the utility for example of of relationships with media organizations which was run before a peacetime spy agency. It was run by our war department in the 1941-42. The office of war information essentially centralized the US military's relationship with media institutions. Those proved to be even more essential in democracy than they were in kinetic war because a democratic outcome depends on the hearts and minds of the people which depends on the media inputs they have. And so as the Cold War raged across Europe, across Africa, across Latin and South America, across Southeast Asia, these civil society partnerships in media, in labor and unions, in universities, in the legal field through rule of law programs, basically every institution in arts and culture obviously it became seen as a national security imperative to co-opt all parts of civil society in places that were of geostrategic interest to the United States.'
'Today the the CIA, the Pentagon, USAD, the State Department are have been funding NOS's and civil society fronts to pick sides in the civil war between
the Republican party predominantly because of the MAGA populist side of the Republican party that is for prioritizing domestic affairs and limiting the international affairs budget. the warmongering, the USAID expenditures and the like. And that obviously runs straight against the interests of the US foreign policy establishment. And so what we saw today against the Republican party has been a
national security apparatus that appears to be anti-Republican, although it's really not. It's just picking sides in the Civil War. They would not be anti-Republican, for example, if Nikki Haley were the front runner or Mitt Romney or John McCain. They're simply picking sides in the Republican civil war the same way they would back a tribal guerrilla movement in Sudan over over a rival. And this is what was being done to the Democrat party in the 1960s and 70s.'
More on Israeli influence in British politics here.
This central idea that control or influence over liberal-bourgeois-democratic media is important for whoever's in power is still strange for most normal people.
ReplyDeleteThe more comforting idea that newspapers, a free press, keep the elite in check & accountable is still very popular with ordinary people ....for a very obvious reason.
Even after the covid-19 psyop, most people struggle to accept that intelligence agencies are wagging the dog that should be wagging them. It's uncomfortable.