A very interesting talk on Neutrality Studies. All the talks on Neutrality Studies that I have heard are.
The message: the USA is behaving like a rogue state and the West has lost its moral standing.
I could not agree more.
Mr Freeman says the Zimmerman Telegram was an MI6 forgery to lure USA into war with Germany.
Is this true? I doubt it.
What would the world have been like had the USA stayed neutral in the First World War?
A.peace between the two sides and no remaking of Central and Eastern Europe or even perhaps the Middle East?
Britain did not enforce its claims against Venezuela in the late 1890s because the USA would have gone to war with us and we feared we would end up losing Canada if we did.
This says Freeman was a case of good appeasement.
'This all worked very well because appeasement is sometimes a successful diplomatic strategy. that is if the country being appeased is fairly limited in its ambitions unlike Hitler who was unlimited in hisambitions. and it had a lot to do with the United States entering World War I on the side of the British rather than the Germans because there was no sympathy in the United States then for Great Britain. The British were widely disliked."
[Were Hitler's ambitions unlimited? We don't know but if Mein Kampf is a guide his ambitions lay in conquering Russia or what are now Ukraine, Belarus and Russia]
More quotations from Mr Freeman."The Israelis and their cohort their fifth column basically in the western world whether in France or Germany or the United States or Britain respond to any criticism of Israel by denouncing whoever said it as anti-semitic and basically they have cheapened the term to such it's - anti-semitism is a horror and it deserves to be regarded as such but they have cheapened the term to such an extent that anti-semitism which used to mean someone who hated Jews now means someone that some Jews hate and want to silence. "
"We came up with an argument about the so-called rules bound order which had nothing to do with Bretton Woods and the NATO and the post World War II Pax Americana. It was we make the rules, we decide who they apply to. They don't apply to us, but you better obey. ...
"Europeans in my view constitute the what I call the coalition of the deluded. That is to say they have no wherewithal with which to actually enable Ukraine to even defend itself effectively, let alone take back the territories it's lost. Their motive is anti-Russian, not pro- Ukrainian.
The Zimmerman telegram was not a British forgery, though I believe that the British sat on it until what they judged to be the time of greatest effect.
ReplyDeleteThe dispute over Venezuela took place in the 1890s, not the 1990s.
"because there was no sympathy in the United States then for Great Britain. British were widely disliked.""
The governing classes were distinctly pro-British from early in that war. The young men who went to train at Plattsburgh didn't suppose that they were going to enter the war on behalf of the Central Powers. The US had too many economic ties to the UK to lean otherwise than it did. It is fair to say that some large ethnic groups, the Irish and the German in particular, had no love for the UK.
I don't think there was very much surprising there. Re Israel I would point out that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.
ReplyDelete