A Political Refugee From The Global Village
An Englishman in love with Bucharest's blowsy charms
Friday, 27 February 2026
This was sent to me. I wonder if I know the 'Romanian Lawyer Accused of Mentoring Jeffrey Epstein in "Dark Arts" of Exploitation'
*Breaking News: Shocking Allegations Surface in Latest Epstein Document Release – Romanian Lawyer Accused of Mentoring Jeffrey Epstein in "Dark Arts" of Exploitation*
*Bucharest / New York, February 26, 2026* – In a stunning twist amid the ongoing unsealing of Jeffrey Epstein-related files by the U.S. Department of Justice, new documents and leaked correspondence have sparked wild speculation and unverified claims pointing to a mysterious Romanian lawyer who allegedly served as an early mentor to the disgraced financier.
Sources close to the investigation, speaking on condition of anonymity, describe the individual – referred to in redacted emails only as "the Bucharest advisor" – as a low-profile Romanian attorney specializing in international finance and offshore structures in the late 1990s and early 2000s. According to fragments of emails exchanged between Epstein and unnamed European contacts around 2001–2003, this lawyer purportedly provided guidance on "creative asset protection" and "discreet relationship management" techniques – euphemisms that investigators now believe may have helped Epstein refine the sophisticated network of recruitment, NDAs, and compartmentalization that later became central to his criminal activities.
One particularly explosive excerpt from a 2002 message, partially de-redacted this week, reads: "The Romanian was clear: layer the favors, never one source. Teach discretion as the ultimate power move." Epstein reportedly replied with enthusiasm, noting he had "learned more in one Bucharest dinner than in years on Wall Street." While no direct evidence ties the lawyer to Epstein's sex trafficking crimes – and Romanian authorities have not commented – online forums and investigative journalists have dubbed the figure "the one who taught Epstein how to be bad," suggesting early lessons in manipulation and evasion shaped the financier's later behavior.
The lawyer's identity remains shielded, with speculation swirling around several Bucharest-based firms known for advising high-net-worth Eastern European clients during Romania's post-communist transition. Some point to connections with offshore entities in the British Virgin Islands – a favorite Epstein vehicle – but nothing has been confirmed.
This revelation comes amid fresh fallout from the Epstein files, including the recent resignation of Goldman Sachs' top lawyer over her own "Uncle Jeffrey" correspondence, and mentions of multiple Romanian women and wire transfers linked to Epstein's circle. Romania has appeared over 800 times in the documents, often in contexts involving young women, modeling opportunities, or anonymous donations – though most references lack clear criminal ties.
Legal experts caution that much of the current buzz stems from speculation rather than hard proof. "These are fragments, not a smoking gun," said one U.S.-based attorney familiar with the case. "Epstein had dozens of advisors across continents. Linking one Romanian lawyer to his entire criminal evolution is a stretch without more context."
Romanian officials have yet to launch a formal probe, but pressure is mounting for transparency, especially as Epstein's web continues to ensnare global elites even years after his death.
The DOJ has promised additional releases in the coming weeks. For now, the story of the enigmatic Romanian lawyer adds yet another shadowy chapter to one of the most infamous criminal sagas of our time.
Israel is a live issue in the United Kingdom and in the USA - it lost Kamala Harris the election
The ruling British Labour Party and the anti-immigration Reform Party lost the Gorton and Denton by-election to the Greens (the genuinely left-wing party) who had courted the Muslim vote.
The Daily Telegraph, which people are calling the Telavivegraph, thinks the Greens have become extremists. They always were, but not because they oppose what Israel is doing in Gaza.
Nick Robinson of the BBC said many will dismiss the result by pointing to a “large Muslim vote still motivated and angry about what happened in Gaza”.
In fact it is not only what happened but what is still happening in Gaza and it is not just Muslim voters who care.
Many, many Christians and some Jews do, though probably few Hindus. Plenty of Conservatives do.
Anyway Muslim voters like everyone else have many reasons not to vote Labour even before you think of Mandelson, McSweeney and Epstein.
This short clip, which I posted before, shows the Reform candidate Matt Goodwin whom I like a lot in many ways, making a chump of himself by defending Israel.
I wonder if it cost him the election.
Masha Gessen told a Ha'aretz interviewer on 8 May 2024 that Biden's support for the Palestinians would cost him the election.
"If he doesn't have the youth vote he has no hope of beating Trump. So that's another brick in the case for the incredible support for Israel. That Biden and his administration are willing to sacrifice the election to ongoing engagement with Israel is heartbreaking, shocking."
No he didn't.
Yes it was.
His senility led to his being pushed off the ticket, of course, but Gaza lost Kamala Harris the US presidency instead.
It will cost the right-wing populists votes in Europe as they all back Netanyahu.
It will also cost 'the West' an incalculable amount.
Whitney Webb has said that there are a hundred Epsteins
"This is something that did not begin and did not end with him [Epstein], and he was just perpetuating this. I think that’s why it’s really important to challenge some of the narratives that have come out around this case that Epstein was solely responsible for all of this activity and that he had deceived the billionaires who funded him and that this is all to be blamed on a single man. I think if we do that, we’re really doing his victims an injustice because this is something much larger than Epstein. If the other people and other parties responsible or not pursued or held to account, this is likely to continue well into the future." Whitney Webb, August 15 2019
Romania's population has fallen by more than 4 million since the Revolution.
The Romanian population has fallen by over 4 million inhabitants since the December 1989 Revolution, from 23 million to around 19 million.
Andreea Diaconescu writing in Ziare.com said only in 1940 when the USSR, Hungary and Bulgaria took parts of Romania was there a bigger drop in the population.
That's not a good analogy as that drop took place in the course of one disastrous summer, not 36 years.
In 1990 alone there were 992,265 legal abortions in Romania: 3,158 abortions for every 1,000 live births. Only in 2010 did the figure dip below 500 per 1,000 for the first time.It it is said 22 million babies were aborted in the fifty years between 1967 and 2017. That's more than the entire current population of the country and abortion is still used as a method of contraception.
Abortion and contraception are swiftly reducing the population of not just Romania but the developed world. It's not the fault of feminism as the same thing is happening in Iran.
Abortion, declining birth rates and mass immigration from the Third World are Europe's biggest problems, followed by terrorism, loss of freedom, children growing up in broken homes and the dying countryside.
Abortion, declining birth rates and mass immigration from the Third World are Europe's biggest problems, followed by terrorism, loss of freedom, children growing up in broken homes and the dying countryside.
David Goldman (Spengler in Asia Times) asked what does it matter who takes over Germany, since Germans aren't having children? He said that they might as well leave the country to their dogs.
The question applies to Romania too and every other ethnic or former ethnic state except Israel, where they are seized of the problem and started having lots of children for patriotic reasons.
Thursday, 26 February 2026
After Iran Israel starts to see Turkey and Qatar as its new threats and India as a new ally
I missed this a week ago.
'Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett on Tuesday addressed the 2026 Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations in Jerusalem, warning that Turkey under President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan poses a new strategic threat to Israel. He described Erdoğan as “a sophisticated and dangerous adversary who wants to surround Israel” and cautioned that the country must not “turn a blind eye again.”
'Bennett highlighted what he described as a growing axis of concern in the region, linking Turkey, Qatar, and the Muslim Brotherhood with Pakistani nuclear capabilities, saying the alliance is attempting to incite hostility against Israel, including influencing Saudi Arabia. He said, “While certain Israeli officials are on Qatari payroll, Qatar and Turkey, which is based in Syria, and with Israeli consent in Gaza, are feeding a new monstrous axis of the Muslim Brotherhood similar to the Iranian one.”'
Tucker Carlson says that American public opinion is turning against Israel and Israel knows this change will not be reversed. Israel therefore wants a new powerful ally with nuclear bombs and will cultivate India to take America's place.
Netanyahu clearly wants an alliance with India.
The secret history of Ron Cohn, J. Edgar Hoover, pederasty and blackmail
I do recommend you read Whitney Webb's book One Nation Under Blackmail.
Here she is on left-wing news site MintPress News in 2019 discussing Ron Cohn, the sinister lawyer to Joseph McCarthy and Donald Trump.
Rod Dreher has made the same allegations about Cardinal Spelman of New York and his network of practising homosexual priests that continues from generation to generation.
The connections Roy Cohn built during the 1950s made him a well-known public figure and translated into great political influence that peaked during the presidency of Ronald Reagan. Yet, as Cohn built his public image, he was also developing a dark private life, which would come to be dominated by the same blackmail pedophile racket that appears to have first begun with Lewis Rosenstiel.
One of the “blackmail parties” Susan Kaufman attended with her then-husband Lewis Rosenstiel was hosted by Cohn in 1958 at Manhattan’s Plaza Hotel, suite 233. Kaufman described Cohn’s suite as a “beautiful suite…all done in light blue.” She described being introduced to head of the FBI J. Edgar] Hoover, who was in drag, by Cohn, who told her that Hoover’s name was “Mary” in a fit of barely concealed laughter. Kaufman testified that young boys were present and Kaufman claimed that Cohn, Hoover and her ex-husband engaged in sexual activity with these minors.
Britain is a despotism. See the case of Graham Phillips.
I learnt about him from the famous English journalist Peter Hitchens who has said, 'In my unending quest for unpopularity, I return to the cause of Graham Phillips, the only British citizen with no human rights at all. Phillips is, er, hard to like. But HMG's treatment of him is despotic and indefensible.'
Peter Hitchens, a critic of the way he thinks Russia was provoked by the Americans, wondered in 2024 if he would be next but he has been safe so far.
This is from Mr Phillips' Wikipedia entry.
Graham Phillips (born 1979) is a British blogger and video blogger, sanctioned by the UK government in July 2022 and again in April 2025, for producing and publishing pro-Russian propaganda regarding the war in Ukraine.
Iran has given Trump what Americans call an off-ramp
Let's hope John Mearsheimer is right to be hopeful.
'Trump emphasized in his talk [State of the Union address] that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, but that he has yet to hear these “secret words” from Iran: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”
'The Iranian Foreign Minister, however, said just before Trump’s address that “Our fundamental convictions are crystal clear: Iran will under no circumstances ever develop nuclear weapons.” That statement should satisfy Trump’s demand.'
'Trump emphasized in his talk [State of the Union address] that Iran cannot have nuclear weapons, but that he has yet to hear these “secret words” from Iran: “we will never have a nuclear weapon.”
'The Iranian Foreign Minister, however, said just before Trump’s address that “Our fundamental convictions are crystal clear: Iran will under no circumstances ever develop nuclear weapons.” That statement should satisfy Trump’s demand.'
UK imposes sanctions on a Georgian TV station for saying Georgia was wise to keep out of the conflict between Russia and Ukraine
TBILISI, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Britain introduced sanctions against two pro-government television channels in Georgia on Tuesday, accusing them of spreading deliberately misleading information about Russia's war in Ukraine.
The sanctions against Imedi and Postv are part of a new British package targeting 297 entities to mark the fourth anniversary of Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
Britain accused the channels of promoting false narratives about the war, including those that destabilise Ukraine or threaten its territorial integrity. It said Imedi in particular had spread falsehoods casting Ukraine's government as "illegitimate" or a "puppet" of the West.
This is a terrifying restriction of free speech - compare the cold war when pro-Soviet publications were freely available, including from 1985-88 an English version of Pravda.
According to Lasha Kasradze on Neutrality Studies the TV channel was punished for saying that Georgia was wise not to take sides in the Ukrainian conflict, but it does not matter to me what opinions the TV channel broadcast.
The invaluable Neutrality Studies was taken off YouTube with a groundless story that it had been spamming but luckily was restored after an outcry.
As Elon Musk says you know who the bad guys are. They're the ones restricting free speech.
By the way, if you imagine I am pro-Russian I am certainly not.
Russia's invasion of Ukraine was illegal and murderous, like the activity of the Mossad in the failed Iranian regime change operation recently and the US kidnapping of Maduro, but much worse.
Having seen what happened in December and January in Iran I am now convinced that the 2014 revolution in Kiev was mostly the work of the CIA and MI6 - many will say this was always obvious but I am cautious - and the unrest in Georgia since the elections of October 2024 largely was too.
The Labour Party's idea is that what keeps the Yukay together is not blood or history but values. I rarely feel I have the same values as the people who rule the UK or run the European Union.
The CIA and Mossad admit that the unrest in Iran was their work - bear this in mind when you read that 36,500 Iranians were killed by security forces who 'hack out the wombs of female protesters'
John Mearsheimer is starting to think that the USA will not attack iron now Iran has committed not to develop nuclear weapons. I think Donald Trump's political instincts will tell him it would be a huge mistake. I pray so but I was wrong when I thought Putin would not attack Ukraine. An attack on Iran would be equally illegal, of course, but Mr Trump has said that legality does not matter to him.
From The GrayZone, the left-wing site that Max Blumenthal edits.
Damon Wilson, the head of the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), was interrupted by a member of Congress during a House oversight hearing on Tuesday after revealing that his agency "began supporting the deployment [and] operation of about 200 Starlinks early on" amid the violence which swept through Iran last month.
Before he could finish the sentence, he was cut off by the ranking member of the House Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs, Rep. Lois Frankel, who told Wilson: "You know what, I’m going to interrupt you – we’d better not talk about it."
Wednesday, 25 February 2026
Jeffrey Sachs talking to Glenn Diesen yesterday
Germany’s terrible leadership is the reason why this war broke out and why it continues.
It’s very poignant to read the memoirs of Angela Merkel, where she describes the point where Germany gave in to US demands for NATO enlargement at the Bucharest NATO summit in 2008.
On the first day of that summit, when George Bush was recklessly pushing NATO to commit to enlarging to Ukraine and Georgia, France and Germany — and I know others, Norway and others — all thought this was a very bad idea. They tried to resist, explaining to Bush that this could provoke war, that this would provoke a crisis in Europe, and so forth.
The United States persisted. This is just an example of the US deep state — in this case, Bush being a very weak president, Cheney being a very dark figure behind him, but really the deep state still pursuing a policy it had already set more than a decade earlier: that yes, NATO would enlarge. They pushed the Europeans to accept it. Merkel resisted on the first day of the summit, but then gave in on the second day.
That, to my mind, is the turning point of Europe. She says, “I salvaged something because we didn’t have a literal plan for accession, only the commitment to accession of Ukraine and Georgia to NATO.” That didn’t make much difference from the Russian point of view, and it didn’t make much difference from the politics that was to unfold afterwards. So Merkel, who was a very decent person in my view as chancellor, gave in. That was her mistake.
Scholz was just impossibly weak and confused. He didn’t utter one sentence of truth or sense about any of this during his time as chancellor. And Merz has been a grave disappointment as well, because when Merz came into office as chancellor, he just beat the drums of war from the first moment. He didn’t say, “Well, I’m newly arrived. I’m going to contact my counterpart, Vladimir Putin, to see whether it’s possible that we work something out.” He just said we’re heading towards an even bigger war.
Donald Trump spoke for an hour and 28 minutes.
Donald Trump is getting old and his speeches go on and on in a way that reminds people of a certain age of Brezhnev or Ceausescu.
We saw this when DJT accepted the Republican nomination, at Davos and now with his 108 minute State of the Union speech, the longest in US history.
George Washington's first one had 1,089 words so took him around 8 minutes.
Mr Gladstone's speeches were long and held crowds of working men who stood to hear him riveted for hours, as he quoted Greek and Roman poets and Dryden.
His budget speech lasted four hours and 45 minutes in 1853.
Cicero would speak for two hours.
I remember passing Bertrand Russell's son, the fourth Earl Russell, each morning sleeping on the red leather benches of the House of Lords behind the throne when I made my way to my first job in the Victoria Tower, when my life was just beginning. He attended almost daily and often slept there but only once spoke in the House, an occasion on which he suggested inter alia that the peers leave London for the South Seas and take hallucinogenic drugs. The speech lasted for several hours till the Lords, which had in those days no speaker and no closure, finally got him to sit down by barracking.
This had been in the 1960s and the speech had been published by a hippy publishing house and enjoyed some success.
We saw this when DJT accepted the Republican nomination, at Davos and now with his 108 minute State of the Union speech, the longest in US history.
George Washington's first one had 1,089 words so took him around 8 minutes.
Mr Gladstone's speeches were long and held crowds of working men who stood to hear him riveted for hours, as he quoted Greek and Roman poets and Dryden.
His budget speech lasted four hours and 45 minutes in 1853.
Cicero would speak for two hours.
I remember passing Bertrand Russell's son, the fourth Earl Russell, each morning sleeping on the red leather benches of the House of Lords behind the throne when I made my way to my first job in the Victoria Tower, when my life was just beginning. He attended almost daily and often slept there but only once spoke in the House, an occasion on which he suggested inter alia that the peers leave London for the South Seas and take hallucinogenic drugs. The speech lasted for several hours till the Lords, which had in those days no speaker and no closure, finally got him to sit down by barracking.
This had been in the 1960s and the speech had been published by a hippy publishing house and enjoyed some success.
"My worst life was under Yeltsin. I walked around with a pistol in my pocket." The late Roy Medvedev gave a very interesting interview a year ago.
The Russian writer Roy Medvedev who has just died at 100 was little more than a name to me till today. He was born into a Jewish family in Tbilisi (Tiflis) and became a Marxist-Leninist which is very bad indeed and a historian of Stalin. In an interview a year ago with Moskovskij Komsomolets, a daily newspaper with a million readers, he professed his admiration for Vladimir Putin.
He was very right about the decline of Europe, the failure of the EU (but it will drag on its useless existence) and the lack of great artists and novelists, but the same is true throughout the world or at least throughout the west.
He is mistaken if he thinks colonies made Europe rich, something Communists think and Eastern Europeans too. Robert Tombs for one has shown that the British empire cost Great Britain money.
What kind of leader do we need?
"Personally, I'm happy with a leader like Putin. Who will come after him, I don't know. I like Mishustin, too, but for all his qualities, he doesn't have Putin's charisma. People like Putin are rare; they're very hard to find."
...The West is currently waging a war against Russia—both in Ukraine and beyond, using the Kyiv regime's forces. Do you think we could have avoided this war? If so, at what cost? And was it necessary?
"We didn't start this war. The West did. America is already withdrawing from it because it has realized its futility. Therefore, America has a future, while Europe finds itself in a difficult situation. The countries of Europe were great, but they are no longer so. The population of each European country is smaller than that of a single province in China. They have failed to create a united Europe; on the contrary, the European Union is essentially doomed. France and Germany can no longer resolve their own problems independently. They have enormous debts, including to America."
1996, the vanished golden age
I like Aris Roussinos enormously. In Unherd he quotes from Mandelson's 1996 tract The Blair Revolution “the respect in which politicians are held has been… damaged by the widespread impression that ‘they’re only in it for themselves'”.
Mr Roussinos says very truly: "The Britain of 1996, the dismal object of Mandelson’s declinist rhetoric, now looks like a vanished golden age: an even partial return to it is the highest aspiration of Right-wing populism".
In fact the Thatcher years (I disliked her in her time) look like a blissful Edwardian age, in so many ways. The hereditary peers sat in the House of Lords, vicars were men, the armed forces, the Churches, the universities, the monarchy, every British institution was in good shape then and is not now. The Cold War kept the peace.
The Major years were better because unemployment came down but the disastrous decision to expand the universities was taken, which prefigured Blairism. The worst things were also proto-Blairite: Maastricht and the negotiations with the IRA, though Mrs Thatcher started that and was deeply hurt by Enoch Powell's wounding question on the subject.
50,000 dependents from the Indian Subcontinent entering the country each year now seems terribly bad but looks very good compared to the deluge that came after (or started in the last months of John Major's time in office).
The Blair-Mandelson years started in the UK in 1997 and have continued till now - the Tory years under 4 Prime Ministers were a continuation of Blairism.
Liz Truss might have been the exception but we hardly knew her.
Boris Johnson was more Blairite than Blair and his monument is the Boris wave of legal, non-EU migration to the UK reaching 906,000 in the year ending June 2023—contradicting pledges to lower immigration levels after leaving the European Union.
His other monuments are dissuading Zelensky from continuing negotiations with Russia in the spring of 2022 and improving Theresa May's terrible Brexit.
The Mandelson-Epstein scandal seems to encapsulate a lot about Blair and Blairism: Britain viewed from a plane by deracinated internationalists from humble backgrounds dizzied by big money; the indifference to the past; the greed (not least Blair's, about which Epstein and Barak gossip), the corruption, sexual permissiveness and the Zionism.
How it makes me miss the hereditary peers sitting in Parliament.
Larry Johnson thinks Russia is being played by the USA. The CIA is lying to Americans and the world. I find it shocking how many people believe obvious lies.
"I maintain that I think the Russians are making actually a big mistake by continuing to entertain these negotiations because the United States is not serious about reaching a settlement with Russia that will respect Russia's rights and ensure Russia's security concerns. It is all a charade. This is part of trying to, I believe, lull Russia into a false sense of security while the United States continues subversive activities in Armenia, in Azerbaijan, in Georgia and in the Baltics, because we're not going to stop until Russia is dismantled."
Former CIA man Larry Johnson, talking on Judging Freedom, says he thinks an attack on Iran will destroy Trump's presidency. Going to war without congressional approval will leave him unprotected and lead to his impeachment. The CIA disinformation campaign is aimed not at Iran but at the American public.
I wondered if the CIA tell the President the truth.
As Larry Johnson says, Iran is not the leading cause of terrorism - Sunnis are. Is anyone so uniformed that he does not know this?
Tuesday, 24 February 2026
Swamp
Donald Trump at the Israeli American Council's annual national summit on Sept 19, 2024 said that Zionist megadonors Miriam and her late husband Sheldon Adelson visited the White House “probably almost more than anybody” during his first term, and that the favours he did for them were exclusively for Israel. “As soon as I'd give them something, always for Israel, they'd want something else...”
Miriam Adelson donated $100 million to Trump's campaign which got her the best seat at the inauguration and, according to Andrew Napolitano, let her impose Rubio on him as Secretary of State.
It does look as though Trump is looking after his donors just like any swamp creature.
Of course Netanyahu no doubt has things on him, via Epstein and other sources.
War and Peace
(Copied from Michael Gilleland's blog.)
"And yet each man among us knows which of the two to prefer, the good or ill, and how much better peace is for mankind than war, peace, the Muses' dearest friend, the foe of Sorrow, whose joy is in glad throngs of children, and its delight in prosperity. These are the blessings we cast away and wickedly embark on war, man enslaving his weaker brother, and cities following suit." Euripides, Suppliant Women, lines 486-493 (translated by Edward P. Coleridge)
Peace Holding Wealth, by Cephisodorus (Roman copy, in Munich, Staatliche Antikensammlungen);
"And yet each man among us knows which of the two to prefer, the good or ill, and how much better peace is for mankind than war, peace, the Muses' dearest friend, the foe of Sorrow, whose joy is in glad throngs of children, and its delight in prosperity. These are the blessings we cast away and wickedly embark on war, man enslaving his weaker brother, and cities following suit." Euripides, Suppliant Women, lines 486-493 (translated by Edward P. Coleridge)
Peace Holding Wealth, by Cephisodorus (Roman copy, in Munich, Staatliche Antikensammlungen);
Quotations
"To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains itself the accumulated evil of the whole." Nuremberg Tribunal 1946 quoted by Peter Oborne
“Israel has killed more journalists in Gaza than all journalists killed in the American Civil War, World Wars I & Il, Korean, Vietnam, and Bosnian Wars combined.”
This is a BBC employee saying that the BBC presenters have instructions not to allow Israel to be accused of genocide or other crimes, illustrated with examples of what she means.
Ancestral voices prophesying war
Is the invasion of Iraq so long ago that people have forgotten it and its consequences?
Probably.
An attack on Iran by the USA for the sake of Israel looks very likely.
An attack on Iran by the USA for the sake of Israel looks very likely.
Mr Trump had three opportunities offered to him by the heads of the forces until now and chose to stay his hand.
However, people who know, like Douglas Macgregor, think an attack soon is almost certain.
Everybody with any sense hopes it won't happen, which does not include the British conservative commentariat.
Everybody with any sense hopes it won't happen, which does not include the British conservative commentariat.
Why are British conservatives Zionists these days? (I have no idea.) They didn't use to be.
Are they imitating American Republicans?
U.S. General Caine has warned that this is an enormous risk and been rebuked by Mr Trump.
The wars in Ukraine and with the gallant Houthis have taught us that slow moving equipment are very good targets for agile modern missiles.
The wars in Ukraine and with the gallant Houthis have taught us that slow moving equipment are very good targets for agile modern missiles.
The US ships will be targets especially for hypersonic missiles.
If a lot of people die I suspect that a lot of them will probably be in Israel.
I can see battleships and Mr Trump's presidency being holed below the waterline.
I can see battleships and Mr Trump's presidency being holed below the waterline.
And that would lead to a Democrat in the White House, a remedy probably even worse than the disease though Obama looks good now in respect of Iran.
On the bright side, it would also put big strains on American support for Israel.
I can't help feeling Netanyahu is damaging his country immeasurably.
Quotations
"The Victorians, so successful in many ways, followed two disastrous illusions, both of them aiming to remake the world. One was the dogma of free trade in the first age of globalisation. The other was the acquisition of empire, at first unplanned, but by the end of the century, a deliberate and equally deluded strategy for an imagined world of “great empires, not little states.
“The problem is not Netanyahu. The problem is the whole of Israeli society. About 70–75% of Israelis say there are no innocents in Gaza. No innocents — in a land of children. Israel kills children as a hobby. As a hobby.”
Professor Norman Finkelstein
"....If we think our present problems are because of a decline in the quality of politicians, we should think of the Suez Crisis in 1956, in which gentlemanly old-school politicians and diplomats directed the reckless and illegal conflict. We should also remember their misguided decision soon after to join the European Economic Community, based on an elementary misunderstanding of Britain’s economic performance. Our leaders of old believed that more rapid economic growth in Italy, France and Germany – which came as a result of rebuilding and modernising after the war – proved that Britain was a failure. Britain was “the sinking Titanic” and Europe was “the lifeboat”. Furthermore, America wanted us to join. So, politicians accepted highly unfavourable membership terms – they must “swallow the lot”, said the chief negotiator.
"Ironically, they swallowed the lot just as the Continent’s “economic miracle” ended for good. Membership brought high inflation, which fuelled the chaos of the 1970s. Under Thatcher and Blair, whole industries closed. With British governments eager to say yes, the EU system permitted and encouraged the replacement of British industries and workers with cheaper goods and people. As with the earlier grand illusions of free trade and empire, some people benefited. Most did not. But somehow, Britain managed to outperform the EU. The sluggish European economies were a drag on the British economy – a drag that the present Government is desperate to reimpose."
Professor Robert Tombs yesterday in The Daily Telegraph
"So far, no American president has had either the bravery or the decency to tell the truth, which is that from the time of the end of the Soviet Union in December 1991 until now, the US has been on a campaign to weaken Russia, to divide Russia, to surround Russia, to put US military all around Russia, to break apart Russia if possible, to sanction Russia to its knees, whatever it is. That’s been the US campaign. So if this war is going to stop, the US has to stop its campaign against Russia. That’s the story.’Professor Jeffrey Sachs on Going Underground:
Professor Norman Finkelstein
Epstein to Mandelson: "you were right about staying away from Andrew. I was right in your staying with Rinaldo"
Mandelson: ".....Yes, without Andrew it would not have gone nuclear."
In just 30 years, London's White British population almost halved from 73.4% to 38.6%.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
