All this was predicted back in 1947 and before

What a predictable and predicted disaster it is having the Jewish homeland in Palestine. It should have been carved out of Germany not Arabia, as the King of Saudi Arabia told Roosevelt in 1945.

Gandhi: "Palestine belongs to the Arabs in the same sense that England belongs to the English or France to the French. It is wrong and inhuman to impose the Jews on the Arabs." 

Naza

Thank God for the incomparable Max. This brief clip is heart-wrenching but it is the truth about the IDF that the CIA adjacent media hide from us. Please watch this if you want to know what is happening beyond the illusory world of the newspapers.

Naza sounds a must see film. It opens in Bucharest on 9 October and after its run at the cinemas will be streamed for free.

Retired US Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (once Colin Powell's Chief of Staff, the stage in his career of which he is least proud) recently said that what the IDF is doing in Lebanon 'is comparable with - no worse than' what the Nazis did.

An Israeli woman I had dinner with in Tel Aviv years ago told me the way young IDF soldiers behaved was no better than the Nazis.

Sir Keir Starmer expelled Members of Parliament from the Labour Party for much milder criticisms.

That wonderful doctor in England Dr Aladwan keeps getting prosecuted for her criticisms of the IDF and vilified in the Dailly Telegraph as if she's the bad guy. Why is free speech restricted by conservatives?

Latest on Guilfoyle scandal

The Financial Times cites new independent sources who attended the dinner where Kimberly Guilfoyle threatened to bring down Greek government as the Americans had brought down Bolojan, as well as officials who were briefed on the confrontation immediately afterward. FT has credibility. It's not the Murdoch press.

On TV former President Traian Băsescu, accused of murky things himself, defended PSD leader Sorin Grindeanu against treason charges but strongly praised the state-owned energy company Romgaz for rejecting the contract. According to internal data, the unfavourable price difference between European and American gas would have inflicted massive financial losses on Romania, estimated between $50 million and $300 million.

The debate intensified following a leaked photograph of a political dinner held on March 31 at a Bucharest restaurant, which included Kimberly Guilfoyle, Grindeanu, high-profile PSD figures and presidential advisor Florin Vlădică. Băsescu argued that Vlădică's presence firmly connects the Presidential Administration to the negotiations, asserting that President Nicușor Dan was undoubtedly briefed on the matter. According to Băsescu, the highly experienced U.S. Ambassador—whom he described as a seasoned former prosecutor—is actively leveraging her diplomatic influence to pressure Romanian politicians into bypassing Romgaz’s refusal.

While Băsescu refrained from directly linking these stalled energy negotiations to the recent dismissal of Prime Minister Ilie Bolojan's cabinet, he noted that Romanian politicians historically yield to foreign interests. He referenced past controversial deals, such as the Bechtel highway contract and the privatization of the Galați steel mill, as examples of Romania offering economic favors to international powers. 

Guilfoyle was not acting alone to enrich her close associate.  The Trump family are heavily involved. The Albanian connection brings Jared Kushner to mind.

The hero is Bolojan, the villains PSD, AUR and the generals who decide contracts. 

They all know in Romania, Greece and the White House that Russia is no threat to Nato but it's all about making money.

Is murder wrong?

AJ Balfour, the only philosopher to become Prime Minister of England, said that philosophical argunents for why murder is wrong agree only in their conclusion, which forced him to suspect that the authors began with the conclusion and worked backwards.

"It is true, no doubt, that the subject-matter of Morality is, or is believed to be, familiar to all the world. But it is also true that every philosopher has found himself compelled to search for the grounds of its authority, to map out its provinces, and to explain its origins. I have read many of these arguments, but, in spite of wide differences of method and profound disagreements in principle, I have found that they almost invariably coincide in one singular result. Whatever their starting-point, they all arrive at the same conclusion. They may differ as to why we ought to be good, but they are practically at one as to what goodness consists in.

"It is a matter of common observation that moralists of every school, however much they differ as to the grounds of obligation, are very nearly agreed as to the thing which is obligatory. They may argue indefinitely as to why murder is wrong, but they are all agreed that it is wrong. They may find it impossible to harmonize their theories as to the nature of the moral sense, or the origin of the concepts of 'duty' and 'right,' but they are quite at one when they come to practical rules of conduct.

"The reason of this phenomenon is not far to seek. The moralist does not, as a rule, generate his premises and then deduce his conclusions. He starts with his conclusions."

AJ Balfour, A Defence of Philosophic Doubt, Being an Essay on the Foundations of Belief, 1879.

Balfour had intended to call it A Defence of Scepticism and scepticism is the most important conservative value but his uncle Lord Salisbury (this is where the phrase 'Bob's your uncle' comes from) warned him to rename it lest people who only knew it by its title would assume he was sceptical of the existence of God, something that would have killed a political career in that more civilised era.

Even these lines show AJP Taylor was right to call Balfour trivial but he makes a point that is true enough and not just about philosophy. 

People come to their views from emotions and then justify them. 

This is why wars happen. 

If you seek the proof look around you, though unfortunately people no longer think murder is wrong, if it happens in far away countries.

"I think Donald Trump has correctly sensed the zeitgeist, the spirit of our age, which is genocidal" said former US Ambassador Chas Freeman about Mr Trump’s speech last week at the UN.

Yes - more true today than ever

'Sooner or later ... one has to take sides. If one is to remain human.'

Graham Greene in The Quiet American, the most devastating critique of American foreign policy there is.

Herbert Hoover from the grave blames Franklin Roosevelt for Pearl Harbor and thinks England and France should not have gone to war in 1939

If it were not for plane journeys would I read books? 

Coming back from Athens I finally started Herbert Hoover's wonderful book Freedom Betrayed: Herbert Hoover's Secret History of the Second World War and Its Aftermath which was on my Kindle.

Like Neville Chamberlain Hoover was a great man in the wrong place at the wrong time - in Hoover's case US President at the time of the Wall St crash which started the Great Depression

Had he been president in 1941 Japan would not have gone to war with the US (he argues that FDR provoked Pearl Harbor and the Japanese capture of various British and French colonies). 

Had he been president in 1939 England and France might not have ended up declaring war on Germany. 

Hoover called Chamberlain's guarantee to Poland's security "the biggest blunder in the whole history of European power diplomacy" and done because FDR pressured England and France to do so.

He said US Ambassador Joseph Kennedy, father of John F Kennedy, was used by FDR to get England to take a hard stance against Germany but in fact unlike the president Joe Kennedy, who became close to Chamberlain, was keen to prevent war.

Interestingly in his diary entry for December 27, 1945 James Forrestal (then US Navy Secretary) records playing golf with Kennedy and that "Chamberlain, he says, stated that America and the world Jews had forced England into the war."

In Hoover's view, had FDR not done this Hitler would have moved east to fight Bolshevik Russia leaving the democracies out of the war. 

Baldwin wanted war if it came to be betwen Germany and Russia with us staying out , as he explained to a three man parliamentary delegation of whom one was Churchill in 1936.

Historian Maurice Cowling, who would have taught me had I gone to Peterhouse, said the same thing. John Charmley probably thought so too. It's implied in his two books on appeasement, which he self-deprecatingly described as translations of Cowling into English.

If Hoover was right the USA laid the foundation for the American empire that rules most of the world today at British and French expense in 1939. 

There is a direct path between US pressure on England and France to give the Polish and Romanian governments a guarantee of military aid in 1939 and the cold war, the expansion of Nato to Eastern Europe and the recent US attacks on Iran and Venezuela.

I blogged about the book here years ago without having read it.

As Voltaire once said

“It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets" Questions about Miracles (1765). This is topical always.

"When it is a question of money, everybody is of the same religion." In a letter to Mme. d'Épinal

"It is dangerous to be right in matters on which the established authorities are wrong." The Age of Louis XIV (1751). 

“Judge a man by his questions rather than by his answers” is often attibuted to Vooltaire but it is the Duke of Lévis in his 1808 book Maximes et réflexions sur différents sujets de morale et de politique. It is very true. Interesting questions are what matter especially when it comes to AI.

"Creator — A comedian whose audience is afraid to laugh" is another and obvious misattribution. It is the godless HL Mencken in his 1920 work A Book of Burlesques. It might be true. It probably is.

Jordan Peterson is right - I think best when talking to someone

"Most people think by talking. It's actually really hard to think, because to think properly you have to be like three people in your own head, because you have to have an argument.


"If you ask yourself, like you're asking someone, which I think is a form of prayer, if you ask yourself instead of telling yourself, 'What is it that I could do, to set things more right today, that I would actually do?' It's usually some small thing... Then you can go do it." 

Confirmation bias

I am saddened and infuriated by how people take sides and then read everything to favour of the side they've taken. 

You see this with people who dismiss all evidence that suggests the Ukrainian government is corrupt (or that Ukrainian policy is mistaken) as being pro-Russian and therefore untrue.

But I did this myself for a long time. I too had a secret policeman in my brain.

Some people likewise take any evidence that Israel is committing war crimes as being anti-Western, even anti-Semitic, yet how is Israel helping the West (a cold war expression that should be ditched anyway)?

I'm certainly not anti-Ukrainian. I took a side in the Arab-Israel dispute only when I read up on it on October 7, 2023 but having taken a side do I look at the evidence dispassionately? 

I don't bother to read anything written in the Murdoch press and I certainly dismiss anything written in the Daily Telegraph on the subject of Ukraine, Israel or the Middle East. But I do occasionally read the stuff the Telegraph prints because I still have a subscription and am almost always horrified at the way the truth is twisted. 

So yes I do give the Telegraph a chance by reading it very occasionally, though certainly not with an open mind. 

See how many inaccurate statements you can find here. There are at least two very big ones plus the usual absolute distortions, worthy of the paper in the 1914-18 war.

Athens at 8 o'clock on a crisp morning

 

For years Athenians have refused to let a mosque be built here but why don't they let Mahometans use the old one? Half the population used to be Mahometan before the nationalists started the war of 1821-29.

In the Benaki Museum, Athens

It's the Athenian equivalent of Sir John Soane's Museum in London, my favourite London museum. I discovered it just now.

Both contain the eclectic collections of interesting men. 

The Zambaccian is the Bucharest equivalent. 

Here is 6th century AD tapestry fragment showing a personification of Spring. It's like Picasso.

Mid 16th century, possibly from a workshop in Wallachia or Moldavia, but it looks late 19th century, perhaps Burne-Jones:

Meir Baruchin an Israeli teacher arrested in November 2023 for criticising Israeli actions towards Arabs on Facebook, talking to Chris Hedges, April 8, 2024

'Chris, we kill the Palestinians. We injure the Palestinians. We have more than 1,500 Palestinians in administrative detention. We demolish their houses. We confiscate their property, their waters. We cut down their olive trees. We put them in quarantines on Jewish holidays. And you know what? It goes even beyond that. We are conducting, for generations, a campaign to conceal every sign of Palestinian identity in this land, every sign of Palestinian culture. And most Israelis expect the Palestinians to accept it. And if they don’t, they can always leave.'

AI

Lytton Strachey said, "The history of the 19th century will never be written because we know far too much about it." What would he say about AI?

We are living in the most exciting moment in the history of the world since the Emperor Constantine became a Christian.

I am hopeful. AI means possibly an end to mass migrations of unskilled labourers and of US-UK world hegemony.

Ambassador Chas Freeman: Trump read the spirit of the age as genocidal.

 

“I think Donald Trump has correctly sensed the zeitgeist, the spirit of our age, which is genocidal. Basically, he’s stating an intention to commit genocide against the people of Iran. And people sit there, and they say nothing. Why do they say nothing? First, they may regard him as a comic character, a tragicomic character who has the habit of blustering and not following through. So they may not take him seriously. But I think there is every reason to take him seriously, because I think Donald Trump is a bully who respects only two kinds of people or nations. One is the powerful, and he faces in the United States a very powerful Zionist lobby which remains committed to the destruction of Iran. And he is enthralled to that lobby, to donors from that lobby who take their cues, their direction, from the fascist government in Israel. And the second kind of person he respects is those who can blackmail him, and the Israelis apparently have the ability to do that.

Cancer?

On Thursday Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed the United Nations General Assembly. During the speech, he held up a portable Starlink Mini kit and criticised the Iranian government for spending billions to enforce a five-month internet blockade. 

He thus made clear that there was obviously there was a highly coordinated, covert operation aimed at regime change involving Elon Musk who let Iranians use Starlinkfor free at the end of last year.

Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennett had already openly admitted that Israel had been secretly smuggling tens of thousands of Starlink receivers into Iran to fuel anti-government demonstrations. 

US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Besant admitted the US drove down the value of Iranian currency for this purpose. 

Mike Pompeo spoke about Mossad involvement. 

Allegedly Russia gave Iran the codes to hack Starlink probably leading to many Mossad assets being killed or imprisoned. 

Israeli media have already publicised the failed Israeli plot. 

The CIA were equally involved.

Hundreds or even thousands of Kurds who crossed the Turkish border into Iran were killed thanks to a tip-off from Turkey according to India General Bakshi.

This was as much an illegal act of war as the attack in February, or the invasion of Afghanistan or Iraq or Syria (the UK was involved in all those attacks) or the assault on Venezuela or the takeover of Greenland or the planned invasion of Cuba - or the overthrow of the last Romanian government or the coup in Turkey, if the latter two involved the Americans.  

Is it going too far to say that America is the cancer of the world?

Did America overthrow the last Romanian government like it has overthrown countless governments?

The Wall Street Journal yesterday reported that US Ambassador to Greece Kimberly Guilfoyle allegedly claimed during a private dinner in March 2026 that the United States played a role in the downfall of the Bolojan government. 

During a discussion in March with the Greek Energy Minister Stavros Papastavrou, Miss Guilfoyle reportedly pointed to the recent collapse of the government led by Ilie Bolojan in Romania and said, "We can do this to any country we want. We can do it here too," prompting the Greek minister to counter that the U.S. cannot replace a democratically elected government. 

Miss Guilfoyle denies the claim. 

Ilie Bolojan is said to have refused requests from an American-Greek consortium Aktor Group to purchase U.S. gas at rates above market prices. 

The Wall Street Journal mentioned the heavy involvement of businessman and registered lobbyist Christos Marafatsos, who frequently shadowed Guilfoyle at official diplomatic meetings across the Balkans, lobbying for the Aktor Group, which recently expanded into the natural gas sector and stood to profit from these regional U.S. LNG distribution agreements. 

She recently joked that she is looking for a husband but Mr Marafatos is married.

Whether Miss Guilfoyle is on what the lawyers call a frolic of her own or acting for her government Europe has fallen into a well laid trap by replacing Russian energy by more expensive US LNG.

It looks terrible for the soi dixant sovereignists (as Farage's support for bad actors does).

In Albania in the late 1990s the Americans created a pyramid scheme which caused economic misery for years to get rid of President Sali Berisha, who was given his job originally because of US bribery. 

He offended the Americans by becoming too close to Turkey. 

My source for this is impeccable but I promised not to reveal it.

The Hilda von Ein de nos jours

Question. Is any politician outside the USA and Israel as unprincipled an opportunist as Frau v d Leyen? She's a warmonger who deplores Russian war crimes while supporting vastly worse ones by America and Israel and claims to be a Christian Democrat while being neither? (A delight to see how China treated her forcing her to go through the immigration queue like hoi polloi.)

Her only redeeming features: 6 children, beauty and being a von. These are not enough. 

The glories of our blood and state are shadows not substantial things

Tucker Carlson has recounted a conversation he had with President Trump just days before the US and Israel launched their war on Iran. 

Carlson said he told him that the war on Iran was “being pushed by Israel” with the aim of establishing itself as the main power in the region.

“He looked at me and said: “Yes, you're right. But in the end, we all die anyway, so it doesn't matter.'”

Why are there still sanctions against Russia?

Trump is now openly stating at the UN that the drug trade was not the reason he attacked Venezuela, but rather to stop other countries Russia and China from gaining a foothold in the Western Hemisphere:

“Our actions in Venezuela are proof that the United States will no longer permit threats to America to gain a foothold anywhere in the Western Hemisphere, and if necessary, we will use our unmatched military might to secure the vital national interests of the United States.”

State Department people still claim spheres of influence are no longer an acceptable idea. 

Why are there still sanctions against Russia?

Two German thinkers

"Each of us is the result of a thought of God. Each of us is willed, each of us is loved, each of us is necessary". Pope Benedict XVI

"Consider the Koran, for example; this wretched book was sufficient to start a world-religion, to satisfy the metaphysical need of countless millions for twelve hundred years, to become the basis of their morality and of a remarkable contempt for death, and also to inspire them to bloody wars and the most extensive conquests. In this book we find the saddest and poorest form of theism. Much may be lost in translation, but I have not been able to discover in it one single idea of value." Arthur Schopenhauer 

I called this early

3 days after America launched an unprovoked war on Iran by murderering about 49 Iranian leaders in cold blood my friend Alina asked me how I thought the war would end and I admitted I simply didn't know but a day later I realised that America had probably  lost.

Douglas Macgregor and Max Blumenthal had by then explained that the America's stock of missiles was rapidly depleting. The incomparable Max (Blumenthal not Berrbohm) learnt it from the incomparable Professor Marandi.

What is even more interesting than that America is losing is that most people seem happy that Iran is winning.  

Professor Marandi.is an internet sensation.

Who'd have guessed?

This is a turn-up for the history books.

Calin Georgescu, Jeremy Corbyn and the spooks

Calin Georgescu won the first round of the Romanian presidential election in November 2024. He represented a big threat to Nato and the election was cancelled by the courts. 

Did the courts do so acting spontaneously or on US orders? (Joe Biden was president.)

Nobody knows.

He was arrested yesterday and charged with fraud, the third criminal charge against him since he almost became president. 

The courts will decide if he is guilty or has been framed. 

Two things matter.

First, if the allegations do stand up in court this doesn't mean justice has necessarily been done. 

The secret services, unlike other parts of the Romanian state, are extremely efficient, so the MI6 man told me. 

They famously have details of Romanian politicians committing many crimes without passing evidence to the prosecutors.

Secondly it has recently been shown beyond any doubt that many (perhaps most, but not all) Romanian judges are corrupt.

On December 9 a two-hour documentary titled "Captured Justice" was broadcast featuring testimonies from high-ranking judges and prosecutors exposing how court decisions are reached because of political influence. 

Bribery of judges is very widespread. 

All litigators know this. 

Some famous local law firms are believed to bribe but I imagine that most do not. 

No international firms do.

Please remember that Romanian judges sit on the ECJ and ECHR and leading Romanian lawyers decide complex international adjudications.

A Romanian sits on the European Commission.  

The United Kingdom is not perfect (the disgraced Peter Mandelson, Epstein's close friend, sat on the Commission) but it might be about as good as it gets, along with the European Protestant countries. 

It's very much more corrupt though since Sir Anthony ("Tony") Blair, as he then wasn't, became Prime Minister. 

The anti-Nato Jeremy Corbyn, who isn't bribeable, said that he was undermined when leader of the Labour Party by MI5 and MI6. 

England America and Romania have deep states.  

Like the original Turkish deep state, they are closely linked to Nato. 

Sweden is another example. 

But corruption in England is nothing compared to Romania. 

Ukraine is worse by very far and worst of all is America.

Two questions that just occurred to me

Will we reach the point where almost any government that opposes or fights the United States has the support of most fair-minded people?

Have we reached that point already?

Postcard from Rome at dawn

You don't have to be American to consider a statue dated 11 AD or as Americans would say 11 CE as old. It says renovatis. That's an understatement I suspect.

I'd love to demolish that hideous building on the far right of the first picture, reminding us of Piedmont's triumph over Italy and the Church, the triumph of freemasons and liberals. 

It only goes to show that unification doesn't usually work, whether unification of Europe or unification of Italy. 

On the whole I think the unification of Romania was a good thing although it was a bad thing for the Transylvanians who would otherwise have been part of Austria Hungary.

I abominate tourists, of course, but they have two saving graces: they're very lazy and very unimaginative. At dawn you have the place to yourself and it's not warm. "He made a solitude and called it peace" words of Tacitus from a different context come into my mind.

The bas-reliefs on Trajan's Column are not nearly so good as the copies in Bucharest because of pollution. 

'Has it ever occurred to you that the Romans counted backwards? Be honest.' Sellers & Yeatman 

Quotations

"If we could see ourselves the way others see us, we would drop dead on the spot." Emil Cioran

"The men who really believe in themselves are all in lunatic asylums." Gilbert Keith Chesterton.

"The Palestinians were never the existential threat Zionism claimed they were. Gaza was not an existential threat. The Arab world barely gives a damn—it mostly wants to be left alone. So why is this happening? Because the Jewish establishment worldwide cannot admit that the problem lies in the ideology itself. This is Zionism following its unavoidable trajectory: Fascist, repressive and increasingly insane. It isn’t the Arabs. It isn’t Hamas. It is what Zionism was always going to become—and no one can admit it." Michael Cohen

"Stop checking his phone like an undercover detective. If a man wants to cheat, he will cheat. Focus on your own hair roots; they need more attention than his WhatsApp." Dana Budeanu 

"You spend everything you own on filler for lips you use to say absolutely nothing." Dana Budeanu

Compliance law is a grave threat to the human spirit

"In the beginning was the Word. ...The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us." St. John’s Gospel begins with the cosmic transformation of abstract truth into a human being. 

Compliance law conversely takes life and turns it into dead words. 

You might imagine that it's been much worse in the civil law systems than in the common law systems but in fact compliance law is pretty equally awful in England, the USA and the European Union and a relatively recent invention, dating back to the late 1980s or early 1990s. 

"We have reversed the biblical mandate. Instead of the Word becoming flesh, our bureaucracy demands that human flesh be flattened back into the Word. We take the messy, deeply moral complexities of human life and squeeze them into the sterile, legalistic boxes of a compliance form, mistaking the form for the truth itself." Paul Kingsnorth

In Dan Davies - On "The Unaccountability Machine" former investment banker Dan Davies explains how modern organisations act as artificial intelligences that diffuse responsibility.

Society has shifted away from responsibility ("the buck stops here") towards procedural compliance.

"A corporation, or a government department isn't a conscious being, but it is an artificial intelligence. It has the capability to take decisions which are completely distinct from the intentions of any of the people who compose it."

"Under stressful conditions, it can go stark raving mad."

"If people are worried about out-of-control AI taking over the world and destroying everything, shouldn't we have been trying to do something about them at least seventy years ago – and probably more like two hundred? "

"Businesses ought to be like artists, not paperclip maximizers."

The world is now dystopian but I believe in the human spirit will rise up and conquer this absurdity.


The European Union is a very good example of an organisation as artificial intelligence. The problem with the European Union is not just that power is taken from democratically accountable bodies such as national parliaments but that the power then disappears into an opaque, sterile matrix of almost infinite complexity, like EU law. 

Matrix means womb and a sterile womb is a good metaphor for compliance law and the European Union and modernity which Marxists call late capitalism. 

The West has become sterile in many senses. 

"We have created an entire economy predicated on 'defensive living' and preemptive documentation. The big winners of this era aren't the innovators or the public, but the specialized legal and corporate compliance class, who have successfully monetized complexity and turned checking a box into an extraordinarily lucrative form of institutional power."
— David Graeber, Anthropologist and Author, Bullshit Jobs: A Theory (2018)

"The great triumph of contemporary compliance is the total elimination of human discretion. By reducing every ethical choice to a codified rule, the compliance state ensures that you no longer need to look your neighbor in the eye to decide what is just. The law doesn't live within us anymore; it sits outside us as a cold text that demands absolute obedience, regardless of the human cost." Adrian Vermeule, Constitutional Law Professor at Harvard Law School.

"Compliance law treats society like software. It operates on the dystopian premise that if you can just write enough rules, you can automate virtue. But virtue cannot be codified; it must be lived. When we worship the compliance manual, we are worshiping an idol made of sterile syntax, while the living, breathing human element is left to starve." Douglas Rushkoff, the author of Team Human

"The danger of the legalistic society is that it mistakes compliance for conscience. When the Word is made flesh, it invites relationship, judgment, and love. When the flesh is made compliance, it requires only an automated surrender to the text. It is a bleak, bureaucratic inversion of the sacred." Archbishop Rowan Williams, former Archbishop of Canterbury

Compliance rules are used by sophisticated companies not in a defensive but in an offensive way, in order to build market share and create a moat to keep out competitors. Increasingly business is driven by legal departments and by creative legal stratagems in place of other forms of creativity, the kind of creativity that creates actual things and actual services.

Early modern Spain comes to mind. There are many reasons why Spain, despite seizing the resources of the New World, did not remain a great power after the mid-17th century. One is the fact that there were far too many priests in Spain. We may now be facing a near future where Europe, which is already in steep relative decline, falls into the sea because there are far too many lawyers.