American analyst Brian Berletic says the US will never make a lasting deal with Iran because it wants to rule the world

The world was much smaller when Alexander ruled it. Neither Napoleon nor Hitler sought to rule the world and nor did England, which was contented to rule  a quarter of it, but America does.

This is from Brian Berletic today and yesterday. He has become my favourite analyst along with former Ambassador Chas Freeman and Professor Jeffrey Sachs. He underestimates the power of Israel and the Israel lobby. Just as we now know Kim Il Sung manipulated Stalin and Ho Chi Minh manipulated Soviet Russia more than the other way around, Netanyahu most certainly manipulated US presidents. As Bill Clinton said after talking to him 'Who's the f-ing superpower here?

China is trying to build faster than the United States can destroy.

The US hypothetically seeking a constructive role among nations rather than seeking dominance over them is for a nation that wants to be stable. The current US strategy is driven by a desire to be supreme. Historically, when a great power chooses supremacy over stability, the transition to a new international order usually happens through a major crisis - like a world war - rather than a “grand bargain.

I'm watching far too many fall again for the same trick - the US pretends to make peace with Iran while "Israel" is left angry & resolute to attack Iran "alone."

Just like Ukraine, literally no Israeli military op can take place without complete & constant US backing.

An entire chapter in a US policy paper was dedicated to having Israel attack Iran on the US' behalf.

Despite this trick being exposed, it has been used multiple times from 2024-2026, millions have still fallen for it over & over again including  analysts.

Cognitive infiltration led by those like Joe Kent, Tucker Carlson & others in the so called "alternative media" repeatedly claiming "Israel controls the US" despite this being absolutely absurd (how could the US make peace with Iran in the first place if Israel holds so much power over the US?) shows how much is being invested in this & how confident US policy makers are that the public can't see through it despite being written out in signed & dated policy papers.

Prove them wrong.

The US has no right to demand anything of Iran in the first place, Iran ZERO obligation to concede ANYTHING to the US.

And none of the demands the US is making are based in reality - concerns over "nuclear weapons" is a VERIFED false pretext to justify what is actually an illegal war of aggression.

Restrictions on the Strait of Hormuz imposed by Iran are a direct result of that war of aggression.

In other words, these negotiations are theater - hopefully Tehran knows this and is just buying time.

The US will never make a deal with Iran because its actual reason for war is the pursuit of primacy over the region and over the globe.

If that goal hasn't changed (and it hasn't) then all negotiations are for is to buy time, shift blame, create a false sense of security among targeted nations to exploit when hostilities restart, to manipulate/manage market prices etc...

As the US pretended to engage in diplomacy with China, US-backed terrorists have been/still are attacking Chinese citizens, Chinese investments, and diplomatic missions around the world - including in Pakistan, Myanmar, and Afghanistan - all as part of an ADMITTED campaign to target and disrupt China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). 

This most recent attack reported on by FT admits: 

A bombing near a railway track in Quetta in south-western Pakistan killed at least 16 people and injured dozens more, according to state media.

The Balochistan Liberation Army, a separatist group, claimed “full responsibility” for the attack, which they said had targeted a train carrying security personnel, according to a statement from the group that was seen by the FT.

and that: 

The BLA has also targeted China-backed infrastructure (https://archive.ph/o/WhWII/https://www.ft.com/content/0bd3988d-96d6-47a2-8006-1810cd90c151) and Chinese workers in the region, including the Gwadar Port, the flagship of the $62bn China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. CPEC is a centrepiece of Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road overseas infrastructure investment programme.

As far back as 2011, US policymakers discussed using BLA to target BRI projects in Pakistan - like in the National Interest piece titled, "Free Baluchistan" which says: 

Pakistan has given China a base at Gwadar in the heart of Baluch territory. So an independent Baluchistan would serve U.S. strategic interests...

Ever since, the US has backed armed militants across Eurasia to target and destroy Chinese projects, kill Chinese citizens, and even have attempted to assassinate Chinese diplomats in what is a US dirty war on China. 

Don't listen to what the US is saying, watch what it and its proxies are doing... 

Sources: 

FT: https://archive.ph/WhWII#selection-2049.0-2056.0

National Interest: https://nationalinterest.org/feature/free-baluchistan-4799