According to the Associated Press:
The CCR argued that her public discourse, including opposition to Romania’s European Union and NATO memberships, made her unfit to uphold the constitutional obligations of the presidency.
So there we have it. It's undemocratic for candidates to stand for president who oppose Romania belonging to the EU and NATO.Had the court not cancelled the November election I think the runner up in the first round, Elena Lasconi, would have won. She belongs to an anti-system (but pro-EU and Nato) reform party which was outside the political establishment. She objected to the cancelation (as did other candidates) because it was undemocratic but she must also have been convinced she had been denied the presidency.
The last president, Klaus Iohannis "the hotel doorman" (Tom Gallagher) was completely useless.
He is responsible for wrecking the duopoly of the two main parties, the National Liberals and the (ex-Communist) Social Democrats, by persuading them to govern in coalition. It's a bit like what will happen in Germany and France.
Eventually the sovereignists will take power in every European country but I doubt they will succeed in their goal of stopping mass migration.
They might throw off the American yoke but it looks like America might do that for them.
As for the EU, Robert Tombs might be right to liken it to the Hapsburg Empire in that it cannot be reformed and cannot be abolished. It will fall apart at some point but not nearly as soon as seemed likely after the Brexit referendum.
It seemed that the Ukrainian war would vitalise the EU and Nato, but no longer.
No comments:
Post a Comment